From author Dan Brown's website:
ARE YOU A CHRISTIAN? Yes. Interestingly, if you ask three people what it means to be Christian, you will get three different answers. Some feel being baptized is sufficient. Others feel you must accept the Bible as absolute historical fact. Still others require a belief that all those who do not accept Christ as their personal savior are doomed to hell. Faith is a continuum, and we each fall on that line where we may. By attempting to rigidly classify ethereal concepts like faith, we end up debating semantics to the point where we entirely miss the obvious--that is, that we are all trying to decipher life's big mysteries, and we're each following our own paths of enlightenment. I consider myself a student of many religions. The more I learn, the more questions I have. For me, the spiritual quest will be a life-long work in progress.
Emphasis mine. Maybe we should give him the benefit of the doubt, maybe he really just answered it wrong.
But then again...
16 "For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life. 17 For God did not send his Son into the world to condemn the world, but to save the world through him. 18 Whoever believes in him is not condemned, but whoever does not believe stands condemned already because he has not believed in the name of God's one and only Son. 19 This is the verdict: Light has come into the world, but men loved darkness instead of light because their deeds were evil. 20 Everyone who does evil hates the light, and will not come into the light for fear that his deeds will be exposed. 21 But whoever lives by the truth comes into the light, so that it may be seen plainly that what he has done has been done through God."John 3:16-21 (NIV)
I don't know how a man could claim that he is a Christian and go on to profess heresy to millions. Aren't his books and movie cashing in enough controversy and money for him already? This man is seriously overrated and thoroughly confused, sure The Da Vinci Code gets people talking, but it's also a work of historical mistruths at that - albeit his disclaimer that the book is based on fact, I don't need to read it to know that that's a plain lie. Given how the Catholic Church teaches that parts of the Bible may not actually be true (among other things which I shall not elaborate upon), I don't know how much help all this "stimulation" may be giving to the Christian community. In a country like Singapore I'm willing to believe that more people than less have not come to know Christ or have been exposed in the wrong way; that is, with the abovementioned sensationalised piece of literature, or with pop-culture-powered evangelical church assemblies. Within such an economically-oriented and competitive society (which effects are felt way before adolescence), how could one start a philosophical debate or plea with those who see no purpose in faith and knowing God? Money is afterall all the security you'd ever need, isn't that so? Of course awareness is a step towards salvation, but with so many variations and claims to "the Truth" these days, wouldn't there be danger of someone somewhere trying similarly to capitalise on the Code phenomenon, or even others being misled by it due to incompetent avenues of message propagation? Afterall, wouldn't a non-believer find it easier to find revelance in something that strengthens his already-present mindset, than to try to commit himself to another belief?
To me the phenomenon spells more trouble than opportunity, and no one should be thanking Dan Brown for his works' apparent commercial success.
Coincidence would have it that today is the 6th of June, 2006, that is 06/06/06. Maybe not so coincidentally though, because this day would have come just like yesterday and the day before it, and the day last year and tomorrow so on and so forth. 666 is the mark of the beast, man's number, as depicted in the book of Revelation, and to my understanding, that's all there is to the number. I do not wish to trivialise the prophecy's significance though, just saying that there is no attached inherent evil in the number's random occurance.
So maybe my conclusive point here is that people (and that means people) should stop believing in superstition and fictional truths and be more discerning with our God-given gift of free will, because at the end of the day, eternity is at stake.
Comments (5)
i cannot say how much more i agree with your standpoint on this Da vinci issue. thank you for this entry, and for all the similar posts that have ever set our minds thinking again.
Posted by shao | June 7, 2006 10:46 AM
Posted on June 7, 2006 10:46
i must say that your thoughts are pretty accurate. =p
What dan brown said is very inaccurate...Acts 11:26 speaks of how the word 'Christian' is derived. And 'CHristian' used there in that verse for the first time was referring to the disciples of Saul(Paul) and Barnabus, 2 very anointed people God used to grow the church.
U can say that Paul and Barnabus together with the disciples were the pioneers who started the revival in acts. And they were called 'Christians'...so u can imagine how commonly and blatantly the word is used today as compared to the past. And Dan Brown just made it worse by calling himself a Christian.
Posted by enling | June 7, 2006 11:33 PM
Posted on June 7, 2006 23:33
did dan brown really claim that the book is based on facts??? wow
anyway i don't see what's the worry about seriousslyy. i mean, it's obvious no one actually BELIEVED the story is real right? and that there are little jesus babies running around?
i mean who believes in this!!? haha people probably just thought it's a novel idea and it's fun to entertain for awhile..
but i dont see why certain religious groups get so anal over it.
Posted by shoe | June 8, 2006 4:12 PM
Posted on June 8, 2006 16:12
Who believes? Not you, obviously, but you're not the voice of everyone.
Why do you think they made it into a movie when it's such a trashy premise? it's a lousy book backed by horrible research, yet it's selling so well. it's controversy, no doubt about that, but if people didn't care, if no one believed, they wouldn't have hopped onto the bandwagon like they have.
The contention isn't so much over whether people believe or not, it's the fact that such a thing even exists, and that Dan Brown can say all these things, and become a celebrity, that is truly worrying.
My main point is that it doesn't do service to anyone, in essence we really have nothing to defend other than the faith. Maybe the Roman Catholic Church has more at stake with its tradition, but most people - same people who are prone to believing the stuff in this book - can't differentiate between the different denominations
Posted by godwin | June 10, 2006 1:36 AM
Posted on June 10, 2006 01:36
I think that you are a very intellectual person, and you are correct (in my opinion) in what you are saying here.
Keep up the good work
lmf
Posted by Lindsay | October 30, 2007 1:03 PM
Posted on October 30, 2007 13:03